The Competition Bureau announced Wednesday, February 20, that it closed an investigation into allegations of abuse of dominance by Janssen, a Canadian pharmaceutical company owned by Johnson & Johnson.
The Bureau’s investigation considered whether Janssen was engaging in conduct that shielded its biologic drug, Remicade, from competition from biosimilar drugs, like Inflectra and Renflexis. This included allegations of predatory pricing, as well as other conduct that could exclude or disadvantage biosimilar competitors.
After a careful review of the facts, the Bureau concluded that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that Janssen’s conduct substantially lessened or prevented competition in a relevant market. Therefore, the Bureau was unable to conclude that the Competition Act has been contravened.
Matthew Boswell, Interim Commissioner of Competition, stated, “Biosimilars are vital to competition in the pharmaceutical industry. They offer Canadians the benefit of lower priced drugs where treatments can cost upwards of thousands of dollars each year. The Bureau takes all allegations of harm to competition seriously, and we are vigilantly monitoring the conduct of companies in the pharmaceutical industry.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand