The federal Competition Tribunal has come down in favor of the Vancouver Airport Authority in a case involving catering companies that provide airplane food.
The quasi-judicial body on Thursday, October 17, dismissed a claim by the Competition Bureau that argued the airport operator effectively dampened competition among in-flight caterers.
In a case launched in 2016, the competition commissioner had argued the airport authority exploited its market position by denying new airplane caterers access to the airport, resulting in higher prices and poorer service.
The tribunal said in its decision that the “overall character” or “overriding purpose” of the airport authority’s actions were not anti-competitive.
“The tribunal also concluded that the commissioner has not established that VAA’s conduct has prevented or lessened competition substantially, or that it is likely to do so in the future,” the ruling stated.
The airport authority had told the Competition Tribunal it aims to foster competition, but also has limited influence on the airline food market.
The tribunal appeared to disagree, finding that the Vancouver Airport Authority “substantially or completely controls the supply” of in-flight food and “does in fact have…a plausible competitive interest in that market.”
Nonetheless, the two-member panel concluded unanimously that the airport operator “continues to have a legitimate business justification for engaging in the impugned exclusionary conduct.”
The Competition Bureau stated it is reviewing the decision to determine next steps.
Full Content: BNN Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand