Canada’s Competition Bureau Seeks Public Feedback on Updated Merger Guidelines
The Competition Bureau of Canada is seeking feedback from the public on its review of merger enforcement guidelines, a move prompted by recent changes to the Competition Act and evolving economic and technological landscapes. This initiative marks an effort to ensure that the guidelines reflect current economic realities and adequately address emerging challenges in digital markets.
According to Mirage News, the guidelines serve as a framework for the Bureau in analyzing mergers, detailing how it evaluates potential impacts on competition across various sectors. The Bureau is updating the current version of these guidelines, which was last revised in 2011, to incorporate recent amendments to the Competition Act and other significant shifts in the legal and economic landscape.
The Bureau has released a discussion paper to guide the review, outlining key areas for possible revisions. These include enhancing how the guidelines identify mergers that could harm competition and addressing the broader spectrum of anti-competitive consequences that may result. Additionally, the Bureau aims to ensure that the guidelines capture the effects of digital technology on competition, a sector that has seen rapid growth and transformative impacts on traditional markets.
The review will also consider recent advancements in legal and economic thought, aligning the guidelines with the latest understanding of competitive harm. As part of this effort, the Bureau emphasizes making the guidelines clear and accessible to the public and businesses alike, providing a transparent foundation for its approach to merger analysis.
Canadians are encouraged to submit feedback on the guidelines through an online form by January 12, 2025. Per Mirage News, all submissions will be published on the Bureau’s website unless the provider requests confidentiality.
The Bureau’s review process, which actively seeks public input, underscores its commitment to a transparent and inclusive approach to competition enforcement.
Source: Mirage News
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand