Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Chris Doyle (RBB Economics) and Martijn A. Han (Humboldt University) analyze Cartelization Through Buyer Groups
ABSTRACT: Retailers may enjoy stable cartel rents in their output market through the formation of a buyer group in their input market. A buyer group allows retailers to credibly commit to increased input prices, which serve to reduce combined final output to the monopoly level; increased input costs are then refunded from suppliers to retailers through slotting allowances or rebates. The stability of such an “implied cartel” depends on the retailers’ incentives to secretly source from a supplier outside of the buyer group arrangement at lower input prices. Cheating is limited if retailers sign exclusive dealing or minimum purchase provisions. We discuss the relevancy of our findings for antitrust policy.
Featured News
UK Regulator Puts Brakes on £762 Million Logistics Merger Amid Competition Fears
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Nvidia’s Acquisition of AI Startup Run.ai Faces EU Antitrust Review
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Voters Across US to Decide on Landmark Gig Economy Issues on November Ballots
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Court Gives Green Light to $110M Deal in Real Estate Commission Dispute
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Mexico’s First-Ever Class Action Targets Pharma Giants for Price Fixing
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI