SCA Chile, the local affiliate of the Swedish multinational which stands accused of entering an illegal collusion agreement with South America’s tissue paper leader, CMPC, has decided not to respond to the Economic Prosecutor (FNE) and their request for information. Instead, the company has entered an Exceptional Delay request before the Free Competition Defence Tribunal (TDLC), under the claim that “the prosecutor’s requirements lack a clear description of the actions and facts that are said to have taken place…”
Among the reasons presented for the requested delay, the Swedish multinational criticised the FNE over the manner of presenting their requirement, while adding that they have not yet been given full access to the regulator’s investigation. In response, the TDLC ordered both parties to respond to the requests, within three days of the announcement.
The FNE claims to have unearthed an illegal agreement for market share between CMPC and PISA, today owned by SCA Chile, which goes back to the year 2000. However, SCA Chile has countered with it’s own version, alleging that any collusion between the two began in 2006, following serious economic pressure from CMPC. “The pressure to join included a damaging pricing policy implemented by CMPC, which caused heavy losses for SCA.” CMPC, on the other hand, has agreed to respond to the authorities request.
Source: Pulso
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand