Alibaba, China’s leading e-commerce company, has accused several reputation-protection agencies for making false accusations about the sale of fake goods and price fixing violations on its online shopping platform, calling for merchants to boycott those agencies.
In particular, Alibaba has named Chinese company Hangzhou Wangwei Technology, saying that it has decided to stop processing any complaints from the company. According to Alibaba, Wangwei has filed thousands of complaints, of which more than 60% since 2015 have ended up being withdrawn after counter-appeals from merchants.
“That rate is far beyond the normal,” said Alibaba in an online statement, adding that it has evidence suggesting that the agency, certain brand owners and distributors have joined together to lodge complaints against popular merchants for price-fixing and sales channel manipulation. Alibaba also pointed out that some agencies hired by global brands have gone as far as forging documents and making bad-faith registration of trademarks.
The damage to merchants from such activity can sometimes be irreversible, as Alibaba automatically removes products from sale when complaints are filed and while any appeal from the merchant is being processed. Some stores, according to Alibaba, have been forced to close down due to constant complaints about numerous products on their online stores filed by brand-protection agencies.
Alibaba said it would “not tolerate price-fixing on its platforms” and said it may pursue legal action if Hangzhou Wangwei continues with what it calls “malicious complaints against legitimate merchants.”
Full Content: Retail Dive
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand