China levied financial penalties amounting to 3.5 billion last year in its crackdown on anti-competitive behaviour mainly among the internet-based sector, according to a report issued by the country’s market regulator.
The State Administration for Market Regulation clamped down on 175 antitrust cases in 2021, a jump of 61.5 percent from a year earlier, the report said.
E-commerce behemoth Alibaba Group Holding was the biggest offender, receiving an eye-watering fine of CNY18.2 billion (USD2.7 billion) for its practice of imposing a ‘choose one out of two’ mandate, forcing vendors not to use other platforms. Meal delivery giant Meituan was penalized CNY3.4 billion (USD509.5 million) for similar offences.
The practice by internet giants of abusing their dominant position to elbow out the competition has all but ended in the platform economy now, the report said. Market order has greatly improved with small and medium-sized platform obtaining more room for growth.
SAMR also cracked down on unlawful mergers and acquisitions in the internet sector, targeting some 98 cases. Once again Tencent was in the firing line for failing to report the 2016 acquisition of two of the country’s biggest music streaming services Kuguo and Kuwo. The Shenzhen-based company was stripped of its exclusive copyrights to online music last July in the first instance of the anti-trust law being implemented since it came into effect in 2008.
The market watchdog also terminated the merger of two game-centric live-streaming platforms Huya and Douyu, both backed by Tencent, last year, after it ruled that the move would give Tencent too much control over the new entity. Again this was the first time that an excessive concentration of market power in China’s platform economy was banned.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand