China’s Approach to Compulsory Licensing of Intellectual Property Under Its Anti-Monopoly Law
Michael Jacobs, Xinzhu Zhang, Nov 05, 2010
While a discussion of the misuse of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) can be quite broad, this paper focuses on one aspect of a significant question regarding the relationship between antitrust and IP laws:Whether and on what terms courts and competition regulators should compel a dominant firm to license its powerful intellectual property to a smaller rival. As many know, this question has already generated substantial controversy, largely because the relevant law in the United States and Europe provide markedly different answers. In China’s context, since compulsory licensing of IP is so complicated and subtle an issue, it may be too soon to recommend any specific approach. Certainly, more discussion and research are needed. However, as outlined in this paper, certain preliminary steps should be taken.
Featured News
Spanish Minister Defends Record as Flood Crisis Casts Shadow on EU Role
Nov 22, 2024 by
CPI
UK Antitrust Regulator Signals Flexibility in Merger Reviews to Boost Economic Growth
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
US Supreme Court Declines to Hear Appeal in Google Antitrust Records Dispute
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
Matt Gaetz Withdraws from Consideration for US Attorney General Amid Controversy
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
Morocco Fines US Pharma Firm Viatris Over Merger Notification Breach
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI