The American Economic Liberties Project, alongside a coalition of allied organizations, has made a significant move to end VeriSign Inc.’s longstanding monopoly over domain registration. Yesterday, they submitted two urgent letters, one to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and another to the Department of Justice (DOJ), calling for action before the critical August 2nd deadline to halt the automatic renewal of VeriSign’s no-bid contract.
The coalition’s letter to the NTIA implores the agency to not renew VeriSign’s contract, which grants the company monopoly control over core internet domain names, most notably “.com.” This domain remains the most popular and trusted for businesses globally. The coalition argues for the introduction of a fair bidding process and the implementation of price caps to prevent undue cost increases.
In the letter to the DOJ, the coalition requests the withdrawal of the 2018 interagency guidance that allowed the Trump administration’s NTIA to remove contractual protections against price-gouging. Furthermore, they call for an investigation into VeriSign’s financial relationship with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), suggesting it could constitute a violation of antitrust laws.
“VeriSign is a prime example of an economic termite, and has used its government-approved monopoly over domains to hike prices with no justification for far too long,” stated Laurel Kilgour, Research Manager at the American Economic Liberties Project. “Thanks to its exclusive agreement with the NTIA, VeriSign has made a habit of paying kickbacks to ICANN in order to preserve its monopoly power and hike costs by 70% in the past two decades. Given the essential role of websites in today’s economy, domain name management should be opened up to a competitive bidding process and have reasonable guardrails to protect consumers. The NTIA can stop this blatant exploitation right now by scrapping VeriSign’s contract, and the DOJ should start an investigation to examine VeriSign’s relationship with ICANN for antitrust violations.”
The letters, co-signed by Demand Progress Education Fund and the Revolving Door Project, underscore the importance of awarding government contracts for essential internet infrastructure through open, competitive bidding processes. They emphasize that such contracts must include protections to safeguard consumers from price-gouging.
Source: Economic Liberties
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand