Emilio José Archila, the attorney representing Cuadernos Carvajal, has questioned the findings presented by the country’s competition authority in the so-calles ‘notebook cartel’ case. The case also involved multinationals Kimberly Clark and Scribe, which avoided fines by applying to the country’s leniency laws.
“When viewing the Superintendence’s ruling, we find that there are some individuals who have been sanctioned because they attended a single lunch meeting over 10 years ago. There are people also whose only sin was to be copied in an e-mail. They have given out 200 million peso fines, without even being able to tell whether the message was even read or not” said the attorney.
Carvajal’s defense lawyer added that, in any case, there had been no actual harm done to Colombia’s notebook market. “The alleged agreements never existed, and the SIC itself has said there is no evidence of there being any harm done to consumers based on the various companies’ share of the market.”
Full Content: Vanguardia
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
UK Antitrust Regulator Signals Flexibility in Merger Reviews to Boost Economic Growth
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
US Supreme Court Declines to Hear Appeal in Google Antitrust Records Dispute
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
Matt Gaetz Withdraws from Consideration for US Attorney General Amid Controversy
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
Morocco Fines US Pharma Firm Viatris Over Merger Notification Breach
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Chairwoman Rosenworcel Announces Resignation
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI