Colombian market regulator, the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC) ratified the sanctions it had imposed on seven private security and surveillance companies that, simulating free competition, manipulated bidding processes for State contracts.
This Tuesday, the Superintendence resolved the remaining appeals and determined sanctions against 14 individuals and seven companies, which exceed $14,000 million Colombian pesos. (Approximately US$5 million) The companies indicted (Guardianes, Starcoop, Cobasec, Experts, Centinel, Insevig Ltda, and Security Management Group) pretended to compete against one another in bids before the state when, in fact, they were coordinated by the SMG group, owned by businessman Jorge Arturo Moreno Ojeda.
“The [agency] certified the existence of a system created and executed by companies and individuals to limit free competition by participating in public procurement processes simulating independent and autonomous competitors, when in fact they were not …”, reported in a statement the SIC.
Despite the sanctions and fines, companies condemned by cartelization can continue to contract with the State. At the time, the delegated superintendent, Felipe García, assured that “the fact that the companies condemned by cartelization are not disqualified from contracting with the State is a point for the country to reflect on”.
Full Content: El Espectador
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh