The Constitutional Court of Colombia clarified this week that the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC), the regulator of markets and free competition in the country, cannot carry out dawn raids or interrogate anyone suspected of competition violations without first having obtained a judge’s order. This, stated the Court, is in order to protect the privacy of citizens as well as public and private companies.
Despite being a key tool for the protection of consumer rights, the Court determined that authorities should seek oversight by the constitutional authority, which can balance the rights of the SIC to advance its investigations against the citizens’ rights to privacy.
The SIC’s ability to carry out dawn raids was considered “excessively indeterminate,” so it was necessary to specify the tests that the SIC can perform. Even when these powers were adjusted to the constitution, Judge Alejandro Linares presented the argument, accepted by his colleagues, that these powers should be conditional to a prior consultation with a judge before carrying out such research tasks.
Full Content: El Espectador
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh