The Colorado House of Representatives has voted 41-22-2 in favor of SB 205, a comprehensive artificial intelligence (AI) bill. Following the Senate’s approval on May 3, Colorado stands poised to become the first state to enact such extensive legislation in the realm of AI.
The bill, if signed into law by Governor Jared Polis, promises to establish a robust regulatory framework for developers and implementers of “high-risk” AI systems. These are defined as systems playing a significant role in consequential decisions affecting consumers.
A key focus of SB 205 is the mitigation of algorithmic discrimination, where individuals or groups are disadvantaged based on protected characteristics. To achieve this, the legislation mandates a duty of reasonable care on high-risk AI developers and deployers. The Colorado Attorney General would exclusively enforce these provisions, with compliance presumed if the requirements outlined in the bill are met.
Read more: Chile Proposes Legislation to Regulate Artificial Intelligence
Transparency emerges as a cornerstone of the legislation. Entities deploying AI systems intended for consumer interaction must disclose this fact unless it’s already evident. Moreover, all developers and deployers are obliged to make public statements detailing the types of high-risk AI they handle, how they address algorithmic discrimination risks, and updates whenever modifications are made.
For high-risk AI developers, additional obligations include disclosing information on potential harmful uses, training data, performance evaluations, and measures to combat algorithmic discrimination. Crucially, they must promptly notify the Attorney General and all relevant parties of any identified or foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination arising from their systems’ intended applications.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand