In a contentious session on Wednesday, the Colorado Senate voted against a bill aimed at prohibiting landlords from utilizing algorithms to set rent prices. The demise of House Bill 1057 occurred after a coalition of moderate Democrats aligned with Republicans to oppose a more stringent version of the legislation, as reported by The Denver Post.
The focal point of the dispute revolved around an adopted amendment, which proponents of the bill alleged had been crafted by a software company lobbying against the proposed legislation.
Senator Julie Gonzales, a Denver Democrat and one of the sponsors of the bill, expressed gratitude towards colleagues who supported renters. However, Gonzales criticized fellow Democrats for siding with a corporation currently under investigation for alleged price-fixing, rather than with Colorado residents grappling with the housing crisis.
Advocates of the bill framed it as a necessary measure to prevent property owners and landlords from using algorithms to engage in collusion and artificially inflate rent prices. RealPage, a software developer implicated in a federal probe regarding its purported involvement in price-fixing activities among property owners, was a primary target of the legislation.
A ProPublica investigation in 2022 revealed that thousands of clients utilize RealPage’s software, with company officials acknowledging its role in driving up rental rates. Additionally, RealPage faces a class-action lawsuit in Colorado, according to The Denver Post.
Following its passage in the House in early March, the bill proceeded to the Senate. However, discord over an amendment introduced in the Senate underscored tensions between the more progressive House and the comparatively moderate Senate.
The bill ultimately failed by a narrow one-vote margin on Wednesday, reflecting the deep-seated divisions within the Democratic party. The disagreements also prompted heated exchanges between chambers.
Last week, Senator Joann Ginal, a Fort Collins Democrat, proposed an amendment on the Senate floor permitting the use of rent-setting algorithms, provided that the data utilized was publicly available. This version of the bill subsequently passed in the Senate.
Speaking to The Denver Post on Tuesday, Ginal defended the amendment, asserting that individuals should have the freedom to utilize apps and algorithms they have purchased. She maintained that the allegations against RealPage remain unproven, emphasizing the importance of awaiting the outcome of ongoing legal proceedings and investigations.
In response to the Senate’s alterations, Denver Democratic Representatives Javier Mabrey and Steven Woodrow, the bill’s sponsors in the House, rejected the changes, arguing that they undermined the bill’s original intent.
Source: Denver Post
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand