Home brokerage giant Compass has reached a settlement totaling nearly $58 million to address accusations of conspiring to overcharge U.S. home sellers on commissions paid to agents. The proposed settlement, disclosed by plaintiffs’ lawyers in Missouri federal court on Friday, marks a pivotal moment in a nationwide legal battle over commission practices.
The agreement, which awaits approval by a judge, follows a wave of litigation targeting major players in the residential real estate market. Earlier this month, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and several other prominent brokerages agreed to pay over $626 million in related lawsuits involving home-seller commissions, per Reuters.
Compass CEO Robert Reffkin, while emphasizing the company’s non-admission of wrongdoing, expressed satisfaction with resolving the claims to mitigate disruptions. This settlement underscores the growing pressure on industry leaders to address concerns about commission structures and antitrust violations.
Mike Ketchmark, an attorney representing the home-seller plaintiffs, highlighted the momentum building against traditional commission practices, stating, “Brokers around the country are continuing to join with NAR in abandoning this broken system. We expect many more settlements in the coming months.”
Read more: Colorado Real Estate Market Transformed by Antitrust Settlement
At the heart of the legal disputes are allegations that large residential home brokerages, including Compass, enforced practices that compelled home sellers to pay commissions to buyer’s agents to list their properties for sale. These commissions, typically ranging from 5% to 6% of a home’s sale price, have drawn scrutiny for their potential to inflate costs for sellers.
The settlement with Compass follows a landmark jury decision in October, where a Kansas City, Missouri, jury awarded $1.8 billion in damages to a class of Missouri-area home sellers in a case against the National Association of Realtors and other entities. Plaintiffs’ attorneys are now poised to seek preliminary approval from a U.S. judge in Kansas City for the recent settlement, which not only involves a substantial financial payout but also includes commitments from NAR to revise its policies regarding compensation to buyer’s brokers.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand