Competition Tribunal uses EU 2006 fining guidelines for first time in wire mesh case
The Competition Tribunal has fined Reinforcing Mesh Solutions (RMS) and Vulcania Reinforcing a R27.2 million administrative penalty for their roles in a wire mesh cartel. The companies had been fixing prices and discounts, and allocating customers.
Following a leniency application by Murray and Roberts Steel, the Competition Commission investigated the cartel. It found that an industry association, the South African Fabric Reinforcing Association, was used to hold meetings, where prices were discussed and set. Vulcania claimed that its participation was merely a sham, and that any agreements reached at the meetings were not formalized in contracts. However, the Tribunal found that since Vulcania benefited from the cartel, the company contravened the Competition Act.
The Competition Tribunal followed a new six-step approach based on the EU 2006 fine guidelines when it calculated the penalties. RMS is to pay R21.6 million. Vulcanian is fined R5.6 million.
Full content: fin24
Related content: EU Cartel Fining Laws and Policies in Urgent Need of Reform (Karl Hofstetter, Schindler Holding AG and University of Zurich)
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand