Roman Inderst, Marco Ottaviani, Apr 01, 2010
Economists have long been interested in the performance of markets with imperfect information—and in the role of intermediation services in bridging the information gap between product providers and customers. Still, the classic information-economics framework for studying markets may fail to account for another role through which advice can affect market efficiency. Customers may suffer from “behavioral biases” in how they process information and make decisions. Thus, it is natural to ask whether advisors help households make better decisions or whether they, instead, exploit the biases and naïveteÌ of their customers.
In this article we present some of the reasons why markets with advice may malfunction, and explore the potential rationales for some of the policy proposals that are on the table. We focus on the role of mandatory disclosure policies, the regulation of cancellation terms for service contracts (and refund policies for products), the imposition of liability standards for product providers and intermediaries, and the outright regulation of the size and structure of commissions.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
PBMs Push Back Against FTC, Filing Lawsuit Over Regulatory Actions
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
Amazon Faces Legal Setback in Antitrust Lawsuit Over Pricing Practices
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
Google Allegedly Encouraged Evidence Destruction to Dodge Antitrust Scrutiny: Report
Nov 20, 2024 by
CPI
Veteran DOJ Prosecutor Joins Farella Braun + Martel as Partner
Nov 20, 2024 by
CPI
DuckDuckGo Urges EU to Expand Google Probes Over Compliance Issues
Nov 20, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI