By Maarten Pieter Schinkel & Abel d’Ailly (University of Amsterdam)
Western competition authorities responded quick and united to the COVID-19 pandemic with a generous exemption from cartel law for any companies that aim to solve pressing scarcities in anticompetitive collaboration. However there is little reason to expect more supply, fair distribution, low prices or wider use of personal protective equipment from horizontal collaboration. The agencies should better have stood by competition instead. Embracing the policy might have been about public image, more than high expectations of collaboration amongst rivals contributing to solving the needs associated with COVID-19. That experimental treatment is not without side effects. By relaxing the first article of antitrust, the agencies undermined their authority, just when we need them to effectively control the many markets that are rapidly consolidating, due to the consequences of the lock-downs.
Featured News
Canadian Breadmakers Settle Price-Fixing Lawsuit
Jul 25, 2024 by
CPI
EssilorLuxottica Open to Meta as Shareholder, Says CEO Francesco Milleri
Jul 25, 2024 by
CPI
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22, Securing Independent Contractor Status for Uber and Lyft Drivers
Jul 25, 2024 by
CPI
Paramount Global Investor Sues to Block Skydance Media Merger
Jul 25, 2024 by
CPI
Software Vendors Win Class Action Status in Antitrust Case Against CDK Global
Jul 25, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Trade & Antitrust
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
What is Wrong with the WTO Discipline on Subsidies?
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
The Abiding Tension Between Trade Remedy Law and Antitrust
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
Trade and Antitrust: An End to Isolationism
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
International Trade Law and Domestic Regulation of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Divergent Approaches?
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI