On Wednesday a federal judge said the Justice Department must honor an agreement it made with the real-estate industry’s largest trade association to close an antitrust investigation.
The Justice Department investigated whether a lack of transparency to buyers around the roughly 5% to 6% commission rate for agents had caused artificially high transaction costs, despite disruptive forces such as the proliferation of online listings and venture capital-funded startups. In nearly every residential real estate transaction in the U.S. the buyers’ agents are paid by the home seller and not directly by the buyer.
In November 2020, the Justice Department reached a settlement with the National Association of Realtors, which agreed to help provide more transparency to buyers about commissions and prevent agents from marketing their services as free to buyers.
Read more: Paul, Weiss Nabs DOJ Antitrust Pro From Cravath
Months after President Biden took office, the administration withdrew from the settlement, saying it didn’t adequately protect the Justice Department’s right to investigate other conduct by the trade group that could affect competition and harm home buyers and sellers.
The National Association of Realtors went to court and asked a judge to prohibit the department’s antitrust division from reopening its investigation of industry practices that it had agreed to close as part of the settlement. U.S. District Judge Judge Timothy J. Kelly in Washington granted that request Wednesday.
“The government, like any party, must be held to the terms of its settlement agreements, whether or not a new administration likes those agreements,” Judge Kelly wrote.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand