U.S. District Judge Iain Johnston ruled on Monday that Deere, the prominent agricultural machinery manufacturer, must confront claims from crop farms and farmers alleging the company’s illicit efforts to restrict maintenance and repair services.
The consolidated lawsuits, hailing from various agricultural sectors, accuse Deere, headquartered in Moline, Illinois, of violating U.S. antitrust law by unlawfully conspiring to limit services essential for the upkeep and repair of their machinery.
Judge Johnston’s 89-page order dismissed Deere’s attempt to have the lawsuits dismissed, stating that the plaintiffs had successfully met the legal thresholds required to pursue their claims. The judge noted, “According to the complaint’s allegations, Deere has the ultimate control of the repair services market. These allegations are not mere legal conclusions. The complaint is chock-full of factual allegations to support this conclusion.”
Read more: US DOJ Comments On Right To Repair John Deere Case
Deere has staunchly denied the allegations, asserting that the company will have an opportunity in the later stages of the case to dispute the merits of the farmers’ claims.
In response to the ruling, a Deere spokesperson and attorneys from Jones Day, representing the company, did not immediately provide comments.
Lead plaintiffs’ attorney Daniel Hedlund, affiliated with the law firm Gustafson Gluek in Minneapolis, expressed optimism about the decision, stating, “We look forward to continuing to pursue the claims of their farmer clients in this right-to-repair antitrust case.”
This legal battle is part of a broader trend where consumers and various stakeholders are increasingly challenging restrictions on maintenance and repair. Notably, a U.S. judge in California recently dismissed a right-to-repair case against Tesla earlier this month, allowing the possibility for drivers to refile an amended complaint.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand