By: Julius Renz, Fiene Kuhlmann, Nick Frenken & Darius Walter (D’Kart)
On 26 May 2023, competition law was once again a topic in the German Bundestag: The Parliament held the first reading of the planned reform of the Act against Restraints of Competition (GWB). The Bundeskartellamt, the national competition agency, is to receive extended powers – we reported. This upcoming 11th amendment is an occasion to look back at the last debates in parliament. Four students of Heinrich Heine University have done just that: they have – in a project with Prof. Dr. Heiko Beyer – looked at the debates in the Bundestag in the 19th and 20th legislative periods from a sociological perspective...
Debates on Digital Capitalism
The challenges and concerns of digital capitalism are currently being grappled with by the general public. However, how do lawmakers evaluate the actions and dominant market positions of tech giants? To shed light on this, a discourse analysis was conducted, employing the sociological paradigm of the sociology of knowledge. This analysis focused on the speeches made during two Bundestag debates spanning a year, encompassing all parties represented in the 19th and 20th legislative periods. The findings offer an initial glimpse into how parliamentary parties perceive and appraise the emerging phenomenon of the platform economy, which is commonly referred to as “digital capitalism.” Interestingly, there is an observable trend of increasing deviation from the traditional ideologies of the parties, sometimes with significant disparities.
In this context, ideology pertains to the manner in which knowledge and thinking are shaped within a society. Here, ideologies manifest themselves through political parties, acting as the carriers of ideology. These parties adopt distinct perspectives on economic contexts and provide their evaluations accordingly. Consequently, different ideologically influenced explanations emerge regarding the same phenomenon, digital capitalism. The following outlines these varied ideological perspectives. It is important to note that ideologies are subject to change and adaptation over time, particularly within parliamentary democracies, where institutional pressures can lead to convergence within the party system…
Featured News
Federal Competition Office to Scrutinize High Electricity Prices in Germany
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Motorola Accuses UK of Antitrust Breach Over Terminated Emergency Services Contract
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Amazon Must Face Antitrust Case Over Alleged Monopoly Practices
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Blocks FCC’s Move to Reinstate Net Neutrality Rules
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand