![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Apple-lawsuit-legal.jpg)
By: Mario Zuñiga (Truth On The Market)
The recent complaint from the U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) alleging Apple’s monopolistic practices in smartphone markets is framed by Assistant U.S. Attorney General Jonathan Kanter as a contribution to the agency’s tradition of challenging formidable monopolies throughout history.
However, critical voices such as Alden Abbott, Herbert Hovenkamp, and Randall Picker have extensively highlighted fundamental flaws in the assessment of both Apple’s supposed monopoly power and the “exclusionary” tactics it employs.
Yet, what seems to have gone unnoticed is the DOJ’s flawed comprehension of the objectives and extent of what it terms “our system of antitrust laws.”
The crux of the DOJ’s case revolves around Apple’s alleged manipulation of its products to maintain dominance in the “performance smartphone” sector. According to the complaint, Apple is accused of impeding technologies that could enhance competition in smartphone markets by reducing barriers to switching devices, among other tactics. These suppressed technologies are purportedly designed to offer a superior user experience across all smartphones, thereby necessitating competition based on merits.
Furthermore, the DOJ contends that Apple deliberately undermines its products to stifle emerging competition. It cites instances where Apple’s actions have contributed to bolstering its smartphone monopoly by increasing user switching costs, resulting in inflated prices and diminished innovation for users and developers alike…
Featured News
Nvidia and Microsoft Sued for Allegedly Undercutting AI Technology Patent Prices
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
White & Case Strengthens Antitrust and M&A Practices with New Partner Additions
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawyers’ Fee Demand Over JetBlue-Spirit Deal
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Boston Landlords Named as US Sues RealPage Over Alleged Rent-Inflating Practices
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Judge to Weigh Landmark NCAA Settlement Proposal in Antitrust Lawsuit
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI