The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM), alongside other European consumer regulators, has taken a stand against Meta, accusing the American tech giant of misleading practices regarding its Facebook and Instagram subscription models.
The issue at hand involves the introduction of account options that present users with a choice between a paid or ‘free’ version of the platforms. Regulators argue that the ‘free’ option is not truly free, as it requires consumers to consent to personalized advertisements based on their data. This means that Meta profits from user data, contradicting the notion of a no-cost service.
Consumer protection authorities have identified several practices at Meta that they believe violate consumer rights. One significant concern is the difficulty consumers face in understanding how their preferences and data are used for advertising purposes. Relevant information is often buried under multiple layers of links on Meta’s apps and websites, making it hard for users to access.
Related: Meta Fined $220 Million by Nigeria’s Antitrust Agency Over WhatsApp Privacy Policy
Additionally, there are concerns about the mandatory subscription choice users must make before accessing their accounts. This requirement poses a significant inconvenience, especially considering the central role platforms like Facebook and Instagram play in the social lives of many individuals.
Meta has been given until September 1 to respond to a letter from the regulators and the European Commission. Should Meta fail to take appropriate measures to address these issues, it could face enforcement actions, including potential fines.
Source: NL Times
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand