Quito’s Administrative Contentious Court has annulled the contract held between the Ecuador Institute of Social Security (IESS) and private contractors Recapt SA. The contract, won by Recapt in 2012, assigned it the tasks of telephone management of patient appointments, valued at $19.4 million USD through 2014.
The same contract was further scrutinized by competition authority SCPM, which has imposed a $2.3 million fine on Recapt. The regulator has accused the company of simulating a contest with its rival Solnet SA in order to secure the IESS contract. The agency has also reported on approximately $4.6 million dollars paid to Recapt on account of “ghost callers”, as well as over $3.1 million in miscalculated fees for calls that were received but did not result in a doctor’s appointment.
María Teresa Torres, legal counsel for Recapt, has already presented a request for clarification to the Tribunal regarding the kind of studies undertaken to determine her client’s responsibility. Besides, she argued, if the contract is considered null and void, the SCPM’s competition objections should be dismissed. Recapt is currently engaged in a different, $17.4 million dollar contract with IESS.
Full Content: El Universo
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Motorola Accuses UK of Antitrust Breach Over Terminated Emergency Services Contract
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Amazon Must Face Antitrust Case Over Alleged Monopoly Practices
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Blocks FCC’s Move to Reinstate Net Neutrality Rules
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Nvidia’s $700 Million Buyout of Run:ai Gets EU Approval, Deal Finalized
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Taiwan FTC Halts Uber’s $950M Foodpanda Buyout Over Antitrust Fears
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand