Epic Games, the developer behind the popular game “Fortnite,” has urged a federal judge to mandate increased competition within the Google Play Store.
Following a jury’s finding that Google abused its power as a gatekeeper for apps on the Android platform, Epic Games has filed a proposal aiming to open up the ecosystem to alternative app stores and limit Google’s control over preloading agreements with device manufacturers, as Reuters reported.
The proposal, submitted to U.S. District Judge James Donato in San Francisco, seeks to enforce significant changes within the Google Play Store for a duration of six years. Among the key provisions outlined by Epic Games is the requirement for Google to allow the distribution of competing third-party app stores, effectively challenging the tech giant’s dominance in app distribution.
Judge Donato, who presided over the high-profile antitrust trial that concluded in December with a verdict against Google, holds the authority to evaluate and potentially enact Epic’s proposal. However, the road ahead promises to be arduous, with expected resistance from Google likely to prolong the legal battle before any permanent changes are instituted.
Read more: Epic Games Files Apple Complaint To UK Antitrust Watchdog
The jury verdict in December delivered a damning assessment of Google’s practices, concluding that the company unfairly hindered developers’ ability to distribute their apps outside of the Play Store and maintained overly strict control over in-app payments. According to Reuters, Epic’s proposed injunction aims to address these issues by also seeking to prohibit Google from restricting how apps inform users about alternative purchasing options, further challenging Google’s dominance over app transactions.
Google, meanwhile, has staunchly defended its app store practices and refuted any allegations of wrongdoing. With a deadline of May 3 to respond to Epic’s proposal, the tech giant faces mounting pressure to justify its policies amid heightened scrutiny over its market dominance.
It’s worth noting that Epic Games’ lawsuit against Google did not seek monetary damages, highlighting the company’s primary objective of fostering a more competitive app ecosystem. Epic Games, based in North Carolina, counts China’s Tencent and Walt Disney among its major stakeholders.
In a separate development, Google reached a $700 million settlement in December to resolve allegations from states and consumers regarding its Play Store restrictions. As part of this settlement, Google pledged to expand the options available to app developers for in-app purchases, introducing a pilot program for “choice billing” in the United States.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand