In a significant development in the healthcare technology sector, Epic Systems, a leading electronic health record (EHR) vendor, has moved to dismiss an antitrust lawsuit brought against it by health data company Particle Health. The legal action, initiated last month, accuses Epic of leveraging its dominant market position to inhibit Particle’s access to the burgeoning payer platform industry, according to a court filing.
The lawsuit follows a contentious dispute that erupted in March 2024, when Epic alleged through the Carequality interoperability network that customers of Particle Health had improperly accessed EHR data. According to a statement from Epic, this unauthorized access occurred under misleading pretenses. This dispute was resolved on October 3, 2024, when both companies accepted a resolution from Carequality.
Epic’s response to the lawsuit underscores its position that Particle is attempting to deflect attention from serious allegations regarding patient privacy violations. An Epic representative asserted in a letter to the federal court, “This lawsuit is Particle’s attempt to distract from the public reckoning stemming from Particle’s customers violating patient privacy by improperly accessing patient records for non-treatment purposes.” The statement went on to highlight concerns that Particle had enabled access to sensitive patient data for a company involved in medical records analysis for class action lawsuits.
In its motion to dismiss, Epic’s legal team pointed out several deficiencies within Particle’s lawsuit, detailing a lack of evidence regarding key aspects of antitrust law. Per the court filing, these flaws include:
- Failure to identify a relevant product market.
- Failure to demonstrate any anticompetitive conduct by Epic.
- Failure to prove a conspiracy among relevant parties.
- Failure to establish antitrust standing.
- Failure to present viable state law claims.
As the case unfolds, the outcome may have significant implications for both companies and the broader healthcare technology landscape, particularly in the context of data access and patient privacy standards.
Source: Tech Target
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand