European Union antitrust regulators have accused a consortium of automotive starter battery manufacturers, alongside trade body Eurobat and its service provider Kellen, of orchestrating a cartel aimed at manipulating battery prices. The allegations come as a result of an investigation by the European Commission, which issued a statement on Thursday outlining the breach of antitrust laws by the accused parties, reported Reuters.
The European Commission revealed that the five starter battery manufacturers involved in the alleged cartel are Banner, Clarios, Exide, Elettra, and Rombat. These companies collectively produce 12-volt lead batteries, commonly utilized to initiate combustion engines in most automobiles. These batteries serve essential backup functions within vehicles, including powering lighting and centralized locking systems.
According to the statement released by the European Commission, the accused parties collaborated to establish a pricing strategy known as the ‘Eurobat Premium System.’ The system involved the creation, publication, and agreement to use new indices in price negotiations with car producers. The cartel’s operations reportedly spanned from 2004 to 2017, aiming to manipulate a crucial element of the final battery price.
The Commission alleges that both Eurobat and its service provider, Kellen, were not only aware of the purported misconduct but actively contributed to it by assisting the battery manufacturers in implementing and running the Eurobat Premium System.
One of the accused companies, Clarios, declined to comment on the ongoing investigations and legal proceedings, stating, “We do not believe that we are exposed to any material risk. We are cooperating with the authorities in their investigations.”
The European Union’s competition enforcer is expected to continue its probe into these allegations, potentially leading to fines and legal consequences for the companies involved if found guilty.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand