EU Antitrust Regulators Probe Google-Samsung AI Deal for Potential Anti-Competitive Practices
EU antitrust regulators are scrutinizing a multi-year deal between Google and Samsung over concerns that it may hinder rival chatbots on Samsung smartphones, according to an EU document seen by Reuters. The European Commission is seeking to understand the impact of this deal, which would see Samsung integrate Google’s generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool, Gemini Nano, into its upcoming Galaxy S24 series smartphones.
Last month, the European Commission announced plans to request information from industry participants to gauge the deal’s effects on market competition. This initiative could potentially lead to the EU building a case against Google and Samsung if any anti-competitive practices are identified.
The questionnaire distributed by the regulators inquires whether the pre-installation of Gemini Nano on Samsung devices, either directly or via the cloud, restricts the presence of other generative AI systems. Additionally, regulators are interested in whether this pre-installation affects the interoperability between other chatbots and apps pre-installed on Samsung smartphones.
Related: EU Scrutinizes Microsoft, Google, and Samsung AI Deals
According to Reuters, the questionnaire also asks respondents if they have attempted but failed to secure agreements with device manufacturers for the pre-installation of their chatbots. Respondents are requested to provide detailed reasons for any rejections they have faced.
Industry participants have until this week to respond to the comprehensive eight-page questionnaire.
This investigation marks another step in the EU’s ongoing efforts to regulate major tech companies and ensure a competitive digital market landscape. The outcome of this inquiry could have significant implications for the integration of AI technologies in consumer electronics and the competitive dynamics within the tech industry.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand