Booking’s 1.63 billion euro purchase of the Swedish peer ETraveli Group was denied on Monday, by the European Union’s antitrust authorities due to concerns that the deal would strengthen the company’s dominant status in the travel agency sector.
According to Reuters, the EU Commission announced that Booking would have had an unfair competitive advantage over other businesses in the market if the deal went ahead.
However, Booking Holdings believes that the Commission has gone wrong on both the facts of the case and the law applicable to this transaction. They are confident that the remedies presented by the company to address the Commission’s regulatory concerns were sufficient, and the acquisition was cleared unconditionally by multiple competition authorities, including the UK Competition & Markets Authority and the U.S. FTC.
The EU Commission argued that the proposed purchase would cause higher costs for hotels and possibly a negative impact on the price paid by consumers. EU Justice Commissioner Didier Reynders stated that “Bans are rare, and today’s decision is in fact the first merger to be blocked this year.”
Related: EU Set To Warn Booking Over Etraveli Deal
Reynders further added that “Booking proposes to display offers from competing hotel authors on its flight checkout page, which is best shown to travelers after they purchase their flight tickets. The selection and ranking of authors and competitors were not sufficiently transparent and non-discriminatory.”
In response to the Commission’s decision, Booking Holdings released a statement saying that they strongly disagree with the Commission’s assessment and looks forward to bringing their case before the European Courts. The company also announced this week that it had extended its existing flight agreement with ETraveli to 2028.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand