A group of leading European companies, including Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Airbus, and 15 others, have voiced strong opposition against a draft plan that could potentially allow major US tech firms such as Amazon, Alphabet’s Google, and Microsoft to secure highly sensitive EU cloud computing contracts. This criticism targets a proposal by Belgium, under its current European Union presidency, aiming to establish a certification scheme (EUCS) for the cybersecurity of cloud services.
The proposal seeks to facilitate the selection of secure and trusted cloud service vendors by EU governments and companies, as reported by Reuters. However, it notably omits previous sovereignty requirements, which mandated US tech giants to form joint ventures with EU-based companies for data storage and processing within the bloc to earn the EU cybersecurity label.
Set for discussion by cybersecurity experts from the 27 EU countries on March 15, the Belgian plan could lead to the European Commission adopting this cybersecurity scheme in the upcoming autumn. The consortium of EU companies has urged national authorities and senior Commission officials to reject the proposal, citing significant concerns over data sovereignty and security.
Related: Cloud-Computing Providers See AI As Business Driver
“The inclusion of EU-HQ and European control requirements in the main scheme is necessary to mitigate the risk of unlawful data access on the basis of foreign laws,” the companies stated in a joint letter, highlighting the potential for European data to be accessed by foreign governments under laws like the U.S. Cloud Act or the Chinese National Intelligence Law told Reuters.
The EU firms argue that the cybersecurity label should emulate the Gaia-X cloud computing platform, which incorporates sovereignty requirements to lessen EU dependency on Silicon Valley tech giants. They warn that the absence of such clauses could disadvantage emerging EU cloud providers against their larger US counterparts.
Featured News
US Judge OKs $110 Million Settlements in Antitrust Case Against Major Real Estate Brokerages
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
50 States and Territories Reach $49.1 Million Settlement in Generic Drug Price-Fixing Case
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
OpenAI Enhances ChatGPT with New Search Feature, Challenging Google’s Dominance
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
First Circuit Hears Arguments on Whether Federal Baseball Antitrust Exemption Shields Puerto Rican League from Legal Claims
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Appeals Court Expresses Doubts Over FCC’s Authority in Net Neutrality Revival
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI