EU Considers Adding X, TikTok-Owner Bytedance, and Booking to Digital Antitrust Regulations
The European Union (EU) is contemplating extending its digital antitrust regulations to include prominent entities such as X, formerly known as Twitter, TikTok-owner Bytedance, and travel website group Booking. The move comes as these companies have acknowledged running digital services that could classify them as “gatekeepers” under the Digital Markets Act (DMA), the European Commission revealed.
The DMA, aimed at imposing stringent regulations on major technology firms like Apple and Meta, seeks to create a fairer digital environment for businesses reliant on these platforms. It prohibits preferential treatment of their own products and services over competitors’ offerings and prevents the misuse of collected data for competitive advantage. Additionally, companies are barred from sharing users’ personal data across platforms without explicit consent, reported Politico.
Read more: TikTok Updates Data Usage Regulations To Fit EU Laws
Now, X, Booking’s hotel reservation platform, and TikTok’s online advertising services may find themselves subject to these regulations. TikTok, whose video-sharing platform is already considered a crucial social network under the rules, contested its designation as a gatekeeper in EU courts. The company’s spokesperson, Elliott Burton, argued against labeling TikTok’s advertising service as a core platform service, despite meeting certain quantitative thresholds. Burton emphasized TikTok’s status as a “challenger platform” compared to established Big Tech firms dominating the online advertising sector.
“We strongly believe TikTok should not be designated as a gatekeeper in online advertising, an area so clearly dominated by incumbent players, and have set out our case to the Commission,” Burton asserted.
Source: Politico
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand