EU Consumers Lodge Complaint Against Chinese Retailer Temu Over Content Rules Breach
Chinese fast-fashion eCommerce giant Temu, owned by the PDD Group, faces a complaint from the European Union alleging a potential breach of online content regulations. The complaint, lodged on Thursday under the European Union’s Digital Services Act, highlights concerns over Temu’s failure to combat illegal content, harmful products and counterfeit goods on its platform, as reported by Reuters.
Under the Digital Services Act, online marketplaces and intermediaries are mandated to take action against illicit content and counterfeit products. However, the Pan-European consumer organization BEUC has raised alarms over Temu’s alleged non-compliance. BEUC revealed that it has filed a grievance with the European Commission, with support from 17 of its members across several EU nations, including France, Italy and the Netherlands, who have also lodged complaints with their respective national authorities.
Related: South Korea’s Antitrust Watchdog Partners with AliExpress and Temu to Address Safety Concerns
Temu, boasting a user base of 75 million monthly active users in the EU as of March, reportedly falls short in providing consumers with essential information about sellers on its platform and ensuring compliance with EU product safety standards, according to BEUC.
The complaint further accuses Temu of employing manipulative tactics, including the use of “dark patterns” to encourage consumers to make purchases beyond their intentions. Additionally, concerns were raised regarding the lack of transparency in how Temu recommends products to its consumers, as per Reuters’ report on the complaint.
The allegations against Temu underscore the growing scrutiny faced by eCommerce platforms, particularly those operating in the EU market, to uphold regulatory standards and safeguard consumer interests.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand