In the latest blow to Facebook’s parent company Meta, an adviser to the European Union’s top court said Tuesday national competition regulators can investigate data protection complaints.
Advocate General Athanasios Rantos wrote in a nonbinding opinion for the European Court of Justice that the German Federal Cartel Office, or the Bundeskartellamt, can asses whether the social media monolith complied with EU data privacy regulations.
“The compliance or non-compliance of that conduct with the provisions of the GDPR [General Data Protection Regulation] … may be a vital clue as to whether that conduct entails resorting to methods prevailing under merit-based competition,” the Greek judge wrote. The 2018 law governs data protection and privacy in the EU.
The case was referred to the Court of Justice by the Higher Regional Court in Düsseldorf after Meta appealed a 2019 order from the FCO to stop bundling information from its suite of apps, including Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, to sell to advertisers.
“Access to data is a key competitive parameter not only in the advertising market, but also in the social network market. Facebook’s access to a significantly larger database further strengthens the already pronounced lock-in effects,” the agency said in a statement at the time.
During hearings before the EU high court in the spring, Meta lawyers argued the FCO had overstepped its authority.
“The Bundeskartellamt has openly undermined the substantive and procedural requirements of the GDPR legislation,” Meta’s lawyer Hans-Georg Kamann told the Luxembourg-based court. The company argued the FCO hadn’t properly consulted national data privacy authorities before moving forward with its investigation.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand