Europe’s top court will rule on Thursday whether Danish drugmaker Lundbeck breached EU antitrust rules by paying smaller rivals to delay generic copies of its blockbuster citalopram anti-depressant from entering the market.
The cases, among several before the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union, are being closely watched by the pharmaceuticals industry fighting to preserve a longstanding business practice.
Antitrust authorities on both sides of the Atlantic have been investigating pay-for-delay deals for several years, prompted in part by the high costs borne by cash-strapped national health systems.
In June 2013 the European Commission said such agreements were anti-competitive as it imposed a $164 million fine on Lundbeck and eight other drugmakers including Ranbaxy Laboratories, which was later acquired by India’s largest drugmaker Sun Pharmaceutical Industries.
Lundbeck, Merck KGaA, Generics, Arrow Group, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Xellia Pharmaceuticals and Alpharma later took their cases to court. Judges will rule on all six cases on Thursday. The industry says pay-for-delay deals prevent costly and lengthy litigation.
“The Commission sees some of these deals as undercover market sharing arrangements whereby the brand and the generic manufacturer may share monopoly rents instead of competing,” said lawyer Alfonso Lamadrid at Garrigues.
The Commission’s decisions followed an inquiry into the sector in 2008-2009. Israeli drugmaker Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and France’s Servier have also challenged the decisions and fines in separate but similar cases.
Full Content: Daily Mail
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand