EU antitrust regulators received a boost from Europe’s second-highest court, as it upheld a record fine against French telecom company Altice for jumping the gun on its bid for PT Portugal.
The decision empowers the European Commission as it investigates US life sciences company Illumina for closing its takeover of cancer detection test-maker Grail without first securing EU approval.
Acting before approval, or jumping the gun, is a major offence under EU merger rules, with fines for violations of up to 10% of a company’s global turnover. Altice’s €125 million (US$146.7 million) fine was the biggest the European Commission has imposed to date for such an offence.
The Luxembourg-based General Court reduced the fine by €6.22 million, but did not cancel it.
The judges said in their ruling the reduction was because Altice informed the Commission of the transaction before the share purchase agreement was signed and that “immediately after that signing, it sent to the Commission a case team allocation request relating to its file.”
The Commission in its 2018 decision said Altice had breached EU merger rules by exercising decisive influence and veto rights over the Portuguese company before securing regulatory clearance for the deal.
Altice can appeal to the EU Court of Justice, Europe’s highest, but only on points of law.
In 2017, Facebook was handed a €110 million fine for giving misleading information during the EU review of its WhatsApp bid. The sanctions did not affect both deals, which were approved.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh