The European Commission has asked Facebook and the Libra Association to respond to a series of questions on financial stability, money laundering and data privacy risks that could be posed by the project, CNBC reported on Monday, October 7.
Facebook and the Libra Association were sent a list of questions from the Commission’s executive branch asking for a better understanding of the proposed Libra cryptocurrency, an EU spokesperson told CNBC.
European countries like France have vowed to block Libra’s development, stating it poses a risk to the sovereignty of nations’ currencies. Data privacy regulators in Europe have also expressed doubts over the combination of “vast reserves” of personal and financial information that would be gathered as part of the Libra proposal.
Earlier this month, PayPal announced it was withdrawing from Facebook’s Libra Association. Visa and Mastercard also have been rumored to be wavering in their support for the project.
Originally, there were 28 companies backing Libra’s development and ultimate deployment. Members of the Libra Association consortium were asked to invest at least US$10 million each to help cover the operating costs of coming to market with the digital coins and to fund their issuance.
The PayPal move, though not explicitly tied to any series of events, comes as the Libra project has been criticized and scrutinized by several global regulators focused on privacy and security. Facebook, for its part, had stated it would not have sole control over the crypto.
As has been reported, Rep. Maxine Waters, the Democrat lawmaker who serves as chairwoman of the House Financial Services Committee, had gone on record to state that the crypto development should be halted while Congress “can get a handle” on Libra, and said that Congress would look to “move aggressively” on the matter.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand