On Friday, Intel was slapped with a $400 million fine by the European Union (EU) after it was found guilty of breaking antitrust laws. The US chipmaker had previously been accused of trying to block rival companies from the market and was handed a record-breaking fine of 1.06 billion euros in 2009.
The Luxembourg-based General Court then overturned the ruling last year, yet agreed with the EU Competition watchdog that Intel had blocked competitors, prompting the recent re-imposition of the fine. The offending actions are said to have taken place between November 2002 and December 2006.
Reuters, citing the European Commission’s statement, reports that Intel had also paid HP, Acer, and Lenovo to delay or refrain from using products from rival companies. In a statement, the Commission said:
“The General Court confirmed that Intel’s naked restrictions amounted to an abuse of dominant market position under EU competition rules.
Read more: Intel Partners Up With Arm On Chip Manufacturing
In response to the decision, Intel said they were looking into their options:
“We are analyzing the decision and the amount of the fine to determine the possible grounds and prospects of success of an appeal to the European Courts.”
A recent attempt by Intel to gain the Commission’s approval for a near-€10billion chipmaking facility in Germany is still pending. An appeal to the European Court of Justice against the parts of the General Court’s ruling last year related to the conditional rebates offered by Intel is also underway.
It will be interesting to see what the fate of Intel will be after the outcome of the appeal, and whether or not the Commission will allow the chipmaker’s ambitions to grow in Europe.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand