The European Union’s ambitious efforts to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) face a major stumbling block, as negotiators struggle to reach a consensus on the treatment of foundation models, specifically generative AI systems like ChatGPT. Six sources with knowledge of the ongoing discussions revealed to Reuters that the impasse threatens the landmark legislation designed to keep AI in check.
Scheduled for final talks on December 6, negotiators are set to tackle crucial issues that have emerged during discussions. The focus has shifted significantly to the regulation of ‘foundation models,’ the heart of generative AI systems, with Microsoft-backed OpenAI’s model being a notable example. These AI systems are trained on extensive datasets, possessing the capability to learn and adapt to new information for diverse tasks.
The proposed AI Act, after two years of negotiations, received approval from the European Parliament in June. However, the path forward requires agreement through meetings involving representatives from the European Parliament, the Council, and the European Commission.
Read more: EU Reaches ‘Milestone’ On Road To Regulating AI
Sources, who preferred to remain anonymous due to the confidentiality of the discussions, highlighted that the divisive issues include the regulation of foundation models, access to source codes, imposition of fines, and other related topics. This week, experts from EU member countries are convening to solidify their position on these matters, coinciding with the gathering of European Parliament lawmakers to finalize their stance.
The major point of contention revolves around the regulation of foundation models, particularly the definition of which models should fall under strict regulatory scrutiny. Some experts and lawmakers advocate for a tiered approach, suggesting that models with more than 45 million users should face more stringent regulations. However, opposing voices argue that even smaller models can pose significant risks and should not be overlooked.
The urgency of reaching a consensus is heightened by the looming threat of European parliamentary elections next year. If negotiators fail to agree on key provisions of the AI Act, the entire initiative risks being shelved due to insufficient time for further deliberations.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh