European Commissioner Joaquin Almunia responded to remarks made only days ago by Germany Economy Minister Sigmar Gabriel, who argued that a forced breakup of Google should be “seriously considered” due to its overwhelming market power.
Such a breakup could not be imposed upon the company because competition law is not powerful enough, Almunia said, noting that the legislation would need a complete overhaul to impose such action of the search giant.
Germany’s competition authority released a statement Wednesday in support of Gabriel’s remarks, arguing he “captured exactly” what competition head Andreas Mundt believes regarding the market power of Google.
”We have nothing against a company using it strength in search to expand into other business areas,” he said. “But if there is an undue concentration of market share of an abuse of market dominance, the new rules for agencies like outs are called for if we are to do anything about it.”
Almunia’s comments in response to Gabriel were made earlier this week when he also discussed a recent complaint filed with the Commission by the Open Internet Project, which represents hundreds of European companies, against Google.
Deutsche Telekom has also sent a letter to the Commission criticizing Almunia’s settlement with Google. The Commissioner noted that the authority is now examining whether the letter should be considered a formal complaint and, if so, whether to open a formal investigation into the matter.
Almunia has held strong to the settlement agreement reached with Google after years of investigating claims of Google’s abuse of dominance in the online search market. While he said earlier this week that he would closely examine these criticisms and has not ruled out another look at the settlement, reports say regulators are set on closing the matter by the end of the summer.
Full content: Eurasia Review and Wall Street Journal
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand