On Wednesday, Meta’s attempt to withhold numerous documents was unsuccessful as EU authorities investigate the parent company of Facebook and Instagram for potential anticompetitive behavior.
The European Commission requested documents from the tech giant, which they claimed were too broad and didn’t meet data privacy standards. However, the General Court of the Court of Justice of the European Union ordered Meta to comply, reported Reuters.
The ruling made on Wednesday in Luxembourg states that the European Commission’s requests were deemed necessary and appropriate.
During the period of March through November in 2019, the commission made several requests for Meta’s internal documents regarding the company’s use of data from its apps. Meta partially complied with the requests, however, it also contested some of the demands that were deemed too extensive.
Related: EU-US To Create New Data Transfer Agreement In Wake Of Meta Fine
Brussels requested Meta to provide all internal documents related to specific search queries, such as “big question,” “for free,” and “not good for us,” among others. However, Meta claims that the commission asked for documents related to 2,500 terms and that many of these terms would result in hundreds of documents that are completely unrelated to the investigation.
The commission reduced their requests after mediation, but Meta filed a complaint with the court in 2020 stating that Brussels’ demands were excessive.
Meta’s legal team referred to the EU’s investigation as an expansive search, comparing it to a fishing trawler collecting everything on the ocean floor, during a hearing in June of 2022.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand