The European Commission has accused Indian pharmaceutical company Alchem International of participating in a cartel to fix the prices of a crucial pharmaceutical ingredient, potentially leading to significant fines for the company.
The European Commission, serving as the EU’s competition watchdog, issued a statement of objections to Alchem detailing the charges against the company. The Commission alleges that Alchem breached EU antitrust rules by colluding with other drugmakers to manipulate the market for N-Butylbromide Scopolamine/Hyoscine (SNBB). This ingredient is essential for producing the abdominal antispasmodic drug Buscopan and its generic versions.
According to the Commission, Alchem and its co-conspirators coordinated to set minimum sales prices and allocate quotas for SNBB. Additionally, they are suspected of exchanging commercially sensitive information to maintain their cartel’s effectiveness.
Related: Federal Court in Ohio to Hear Consolidated Tire Price-Fixing Cases
Margrethe Vestager, the EU antitrust chief, emphasized the impact of such activities on consumers. “As a result, European consumers may have suffered from restricted access to affordable medicines,” Vestager stated.
This accusation follows a precedent set last year when the European Commission fined several companies — Alkaloids of Australia, Alkaloids Corporation, Boehringer, Linnea, and Transo-Pharm — a total of 13.4 million euros ($14.5 million) for their roles in the same cartel. Notably, C2 PHARMA avoided fines by alerting the regulator to the cartel’s existence.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand