EU to Decide on Nvidia’s Acquisition of Israeli AI Startup Run:ai by December 20
The European Union (EU)’s antitrust regulators are expected to reach a decision regarding Nvidia’s proposed acquisition of Israeli artificial intelligence (AI) startup Run:ai by December 20, according to a filing by the European Commission.
The deal, announced in April, has raised concerns within the EU competition authority. The Commission warned last month that the acquisition could harm competition in the markets where both companies operate. As a result, Nvidia has been instructed to seek approval from the EU before finalizing the $700 million transaction, which was first reported by Tech Crunch.
Under EU antitrust rules, the Commission has several options. It can either clear the deal outright or with conditions during its preliminary review. If regulators have significant concerns, they could initiate a more in-depth investigation, which could last up to four months.
Read more: Supreme Court Deliberates on Nvidia’s Bid to Halt Investor Lawsuit Over Cryptocurrency
The review comes amid growing scrutiny over so-called “killer acquisitions,” where large companies purchase smaller startups with the aim of shutting them down or stifling their competitive potential. This has been a key area of focus for antitrust regulators in both Europe and the United States in recent years.
Nvidia, known for its powerful graphics processors used in AI applications, including training models like ChatGPT, is a dominant player in the chip industry. The company’s acquisition of Run:ai, a startup specializing in AI-driven infrastructure, is seen as a strategic move to bolster its position in the AI market.
According to Reuters, the European Commission’s assessment of the deal is a critical moment for Nvidia, as the company seeks to expand its reach in the growing AI sector.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand