The EU’s European Commission announced on Wednesday that it would impose additional duties of up to 38.1% on imported electric vehicles (EVs) from China, a move likely to provoke retaliation from Beijing, which has labeled the decision as protectionist.
Starting in July, the new tariffs will be added to the standard 10% car duty currently in place. The Commission stated that the increased duties, ranging from 17.4% for BYD to 38.1% for SAIC, are intended to combat what it describes as excessive subsidies provided by the Chinese government to its domestic EV manufacturers. This equates to billions of euros in extra costs for Chinese carmakers, exacerbating the financial pressure they already face due to slowing demand and falling prices in their home market.
This development follows closely on the heels of a similar move by Washington, which announced plans less than a month ago to quadruple duties on Chinese EVs to 100%.
Read more: Antitrust Enforcement in the Chinese Automobile Industry: Observations and Future Perspectives
European automakers are facing significant challenges from the influx of lower-cost EVs from China. The Commission estimates that the market share of Chinese brands in the EU has surged from below 1% in 2019 to 8% today, with projections suggesting it could reach 15% by 2025. Chinese EVs are typically priced 20% lower than their European counterparts, intensifying the competitive pressure on local manufacturers.
“This decision marks a significant shift in EU trade policy,” said Andrew Kenningham, Chief Europe Economist at Capital Economics. “While the EU has frequently used trade defenses against China, it has not previously targeted such a critical industry.”
The new tariffs reflect European policymakers’ determination to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. A decade ago, limited action against Chinese imports led to the collapse of many European solar panel manufacturers. The EU launched an anti-subsidy investigation into China’s electric vehicles in October, signaling a more assertive stance in protecting its industries.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Uber and Lyft Face FTC Probe Over Alleged Collusion in NYC Pay Deal
Jan 30, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Certifies Class Action Suit Against Major Turkey Processors
Jan 30, 2025 by
CPI
US Justice Department Moves to Block HPE’s $14 Billion Juniper Acquisition
Jan 30, 2025 by
CPI
Ticketmaster Snubs UK Probe Into Dynamic Pricing
Jan 30, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Judge Clears Path for Texas-Led Antitrust Case Against Google
Jan 29, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Criminal Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
The Antitrust Division’s Recent Work to Combat International Cartels
Jan 23, 2025 by
Emma Burnham & Benjamin Christenson
Information Sharing: The New Frontier of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
Brian P. Quinn, Casey Kovarik & Michael Tubach
The Key Role of Guidelines on Exchanges of Information Among Competitors and the Divergent Transatlantic Paths
Jan 23, 2025 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz & Albert Metz
Leniency, Whistleblowers, and Compliance
Jan 23, 2025 by
Richard Powers, Tara O’Malley & Cory Gordon