The European Union has announced new foreign-subsidy rules aimed at minimizing the burden on companies while focusing on “big fish” that distort the European market, reported The Wall Street Journal.
The new regulations, set to take effect later this year, could bar companies from making certain acquisitions or winning large public contracts if they received government aid considered distortive by regulators.
Related: European Union Unveils Digital ID Wallet Plan
The European Union’s competition chief, Margrethe Vestager, has emphasized that the new rules are not intended to create additional bureaucracy for companies. Rather, they will be targeted at tackling foreign subsidies that give certain businesses an unfair advantage in the European market. The EU is particularly concerned about state aid from countries outside of Europe, such as China, which has been accused of using subsidies to support its own firms and undercut rivals in foreign markets.
“We intend to focus on major distortions,” Ms. Vestager said. “It’s a priority in the implementation that we ensure that the compliance burden, particularly on smaller entities, is kept as low as possible.”
The legislation has garnered support from those who believe it’s necessary to create a level playing field for European businesses. This is due to the unfair advantage enjoyed by some heavily subsidized competitors, such as state-backed Chinese companies that receive cheap loans and government benefits.
Companies involved in certain mergers or bidding on large public contracts must report previous financial contributions from non-EU governments upon the legislation’s implementation. Failing to do so may lead to hefty fines. Some business groups and lawyers, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, caution that American and multinational companies may experience a significant administrative burden.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand