The EU’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) legislation looks set to be delayed by several months, with plans for the European Parliament to vote on the law in December now abandoned, Coindesk reported on Friday (Nov. 4).
Having published what was meant to be the final text for the bill last month, the European Parliament was set to vote on the regulation during a plenary session in December, however, a spokesman for the European Parliament told Coindesk that the length and complexity of the text mean the vote is unlikely to take place until the new year.
Among the last-minute details that the EU has been hashing out is a proposed cap on the market share of non-euro-denominated stablecoins.
Related: The European Central Bank Quick Implementation Of MiCA
The draft document published in October contained a requirement (42d) that would limit non-euro-denominated stablecoin activity within the eurozone to 1 million transactions and 200 million euros ($198 million) per day.
Considering that the likes of USDT, USDC and BUSD account for the vast majority of stablecoin transactions today, the move was widely perceived as a way for the MiCA legislation to grant a greater role to euro-pegged stablecoins and protect the eurozone’s monetary sovereignty.
However, after concerns were raised that such a cap would be unnecessarily burdensome to the European crypto industry, rumors that the limit could be adjusted or scrapped altogether circulated.
Before the MiCA regulation is passed into law, lawmakers first need to agree on the finalized text via a vote in the European Parliament, and the European Council will also need to sign off on it.
Once both Parliament and the Council have agreed on the final version of the regulation, there will be a period of 12 to 18 months from the day it is published in the EU’s Official Journal before the law comes into effect.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand