It appears that the European Union’s antitrust regulations have taken center stage yet again, as regulators have extended their deadline for a decision on Amazon’s controversial $1.7 billion acquisition of robot vacuum maker iRobot.
The European Commission pushed back the deadline for its decision on the deal from November 15th to December 13th in response to a request from Amazon and iRobot. On July 6th, the European Commission opened up an in-depth review into the acquisition. The UK’s antitrust regulator has already approved the purchase of the famous Roomba maker.
In a statement earlier this month, the EU watchdog expressed their concerns that the acquisition could potentially reduce competition within the vacuum cleaner marketplace and potentially reinforce Amazon’s position as an online marketplace provider. “The Commission’s preliminary concern is that the combination of Amazon’s market position with iRobot’s leading robot vacuum cleaner technology and brand may reduce choices and create competitive disadvantages for customers,” the statement reads.
Read more: Tech Giants Amazon And Apple Hit With Antitrust Penalties In Spain
In response to the European Commission’s review, Amazon last month filed substantial compliance with the Federal Trade Commission’s second request. It is still unclear what the outcome of the review will be, however, as the deadline for a decision from the European Commission is fast approaching.
“We look forward to working with the European Commission and continuing to make progress on our proposed iRobot transaction in line with their review timetable,” said Amazon spokesperson in an official statement.
Although criticism of the acquisition continues to increase, both Amazon and iRobot remain confident that the two corporations will cooperate with the European Commission to successfully complete the transaction.
Source: Seeking Alpha
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand