Daniel Israel, the former president of a Michigan-based asphalt paving company, admitted his involvement in a bid-rigging conspiracy for asphalt paving services contracts within the state. According to official court documents filed in the U.S. District Court in Detroit, Israel and associates from his former company, along with another asphalt paving firm, conspired to manipulate bid outcomes in their favor.
The collusion, which started in March 2013 and persisted until at least November 2018, involved coordinating bid prices to ensure that the predetermined losing company submitted intentionally non-competitive bids. This deceptive strategy created the illusion of competition when, in reality, the conspirators had already decided among themselves which company would secure the contracts.
Read more: US: Paving companies accused of monopoly
Israel pleaded guilty to a violation of Section One of the Sherman Act. This violation carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a criminal fine of up to $1 million. The actual sentence will be determined by a federal district court judge, taking into account the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other relevant statutory factors.
This marks the third guilty plea resulting from an ongoing federal antitrust investigation into bid rigging and anti-competitive practices in the asphalt paving services industry. The investigation is being conducted jointly by the Antitrust Division’s Chicago Office, along with the Offices of Inspectors General for the Department of Transportation and the U.S. Postal Service. In August, during a two-week period, a company and two of its executives also pleaded guilty as part of this probe.
Source: Justice Gov
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand