Failing Firm Defense: General Ideas About the Figure’s Regulation in Compared Law and it’s Appliance in Colombia
By Diana Hernandez (Universidad Externado de Colombia)
The failing firm defense is an Anglo-Saxon creation conceived almost a century ago. This conception has been conceived in order to support the fusion integration of companies in financial crisis with others in solving situation, even if its operation from the competence defense right perspective, generates dominance situations, or is objected by the fair competence authorities.
Not only the United States of America but the European Union elicited doctrines, jurisprudences, and statements that have embodied the figure of failing firm defense, but its treatment was not pacific or simple. The reach of these has generated significant controversies regarding concepts and “traditional” regulations such as monopolies, abuse of domain position, and limits between judicial liquidation, corporate reorganization and the principle of conservation of companies.
Despite the importance of this figure as well as the scenario where it can be applied, there is no pronouncement in Colombia about the opportunity, the use and the boundaries of this figure. For this reason, the aim of this study is to present the current situation of the failing firm defense at the systems in which it is regulated, in order to review its effectiveness as well as provide tools of analysis that allow a potential study and development of this topic in our country.
Download Full Article: HERE
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand