By: Mariana Pargendler, Maria Luiza Mesquita & Lucas Víspico (Pro Market)
Competition regulators have historically directed their attention towards equity connections manifested through stock ownership and control as the defining parameters of a company concerning antitrust investigations. Our recent research document illustrates how competition authorities in several regions within the Global South, including Argentina, Brazil, Indonesia, and Turkey, have consistently turned to familial connections when delineating a business entity (or enterprise) during the course of regulatory actions.
Familial ownership stands as the predominant model of corporate ownership globally, particularly in emerging economies. Family-run enterprises often exhibit distinct operational behaviors in comparison to other business types. An ongoing study has unveiled that family-owned businesses in Italy encounter fewer instances of antitrust oversight. Family ownership demonstrates its efficacy in mitigating institutional deficiencies inherent in developing nations, such as inadequate contract enforcement and failures within capital markets. Simultaneously, family control could potentially facilitate corporate misconduct. A recently published working paper by Pablo Balán, Juan Dodyk, and Ignacio Puente from the Stigler Center proposes that familial connections might be employed to amplify corporate influence and navigate around regulations. The authors put forth evidence indicating that in response to a recent prohibition on corporate political contributions, individual members of controlling families in Brazilian companies have substituted corporate donations with personal ones.
Competition watchdogs in the Global South have acknowledged the economic significance of family bonds and their capacity to undermine the efficacy of antitrust legislation. These agencies have leaned on familial relationships as legal links to associate separate legal entities controlled by different members of the same family, especially during investigations into mergers and anticompetitive agreements…
Featured News
Australia Passes Strict Social Media Ban for Under-16s
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
Google Appeals Ruling Overhaul of Play Store in Epic Games Lawsuit
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Investigates Uber for Alleged Subscription Violations
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
India’s Watchdog Launches Investigation Into Google’s Real-Money Gaming Policies
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
Microsoft Under FTC Scrutiny for Cloud, AI, and Licensing Practices
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI