Federal authorities have charged an Ohio man with taking part in a fraudulent cryptocurrency investment scheme that raised at least $10 million from investors.
According to a news release from the U.S. Justice Department, Rathnakishore Giri, 27, is accused of misleading investors by falsely claiming to be an expert in cryptocurrency trading specializing in bitcoin derivatives.
He is charged with five counts of wire fraud and faces up to 20 years in prison on each count if convicted, the department said.
“Giri falsely promised investors that he would generate lucrative returns with no risk to their principal investment amount, which he guaranteed to return,” the release said. “In reality, Giri often allegedly used money provided by new investors to repay old investors — a hallmark of a Ponzi scheme.”
Related: OCC’s Comptroller: Crypto Economy Is Dependent On ‘Hype’
Authorities also allege that an FBI investigation found that Giri had a lengthy history of losing investors’ principal contributions, and misled investors about why he couldn’t let them cash out their investments or get a return on their “guaranteed” principal.
The charges against Giri come as federal authorities are gearing up for a much larger crypto investigation, involving the collapsed exchange FTX and its former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (or SBF, as he’s often called).
“While the scandal and its fallout occurred across cryptocurrency marketplaces,” PYMNTS wrote recently, “the tactics SBF and FTX are being accused of deploying resemble those of a standard Ponzi scheme rather than a blockchain-based, crypto-native scam.”
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand